Europe – European Commission – public consultation – from 15 December 2025 to 26 January 2026 – revision of the rules for calculating greenhouse gas emission reductions applicable to bioenergy (amendment of the values applicable to production pathways for biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels, and amendment of the methodology – RED II Directive)

Europe – European Commission – public consultation – from 15 December 2025 to 26 January 2026 – revision of the rules for calculating greenhouse gas emission reductions applicable to bioenergy (amendment of the values applicable to production pathways for biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels, and amendment of the methodology – RED II Directive)

by | 6 January 2026 | *Europe

HAVET & VANHUFFEL – Association d’avocats Europe – European Commission – public consultation – from 15 December 2025 to 26 January 2026 – revision of the rules for calculating greenhouse gas emission reductions applicable to bioenergy (amendment of the...
Europe – Regulation (EU) 2023/956 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 May 2023 – entry into force on 1 January 2026 of the financial part of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM)

Europe – Regulation (EU) 2023/956 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 May 2023 – entry into force on 1 January 2026 of the financial part of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM)

by | 26 December 2025 | *Europe

Europe – Regulation (EU) 2023/956 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 May 2023 – entry into force on 1 January 2026 of the financial part of the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) 1. General context and objectives of the regulation As part of...
Europe – The European Court of Human Rights, in a judgment of 4 December 2025 (No. 9953/16 – Kosmatska v. Ukraine), found Ukraine responsible for ensuring the full restitution of the applicant’s property title over a plot of land, or providing her with financial compensation or equivalent property, when the land had been purchased in good faith from individuals who had acquired it fraudulently to the detriment of the Ukrainian State. The Court held that, although the public-interest objective invoked (restoration of land lawfulness) may be legitimate, the measure applied to the applicant was disproportionate due to her good faith and the State’s failure in maintaining land registers, as this dispossession imposed an excessive individual burden on the bona fide citizen

Europe – The European Court of Human Rights, in a judgment of 4 December 2025 (No. 9953/16 – Kosmatska v. Ukraine), found Ukraine responsible for ensuring the full restitution of the applicant’s property title over a plot of land, or providing her with financial compensation or equivalent property, when the land had been purchased in good faith from individuals who had acquired it fraudulently to the detriment of the Ukrainian State. The Court held that, although the public-interest objective invoked (restoration of land lawfulness) may be legitimate, the measure applied to the applicant was disproportionate due to her good faith and the State’s failure in maintaining land registers, as this dispossession imposed an excessive individual burden on the bona fide citizen

by | 4 December 2025 | *Europe

HAVET & VANHUFFEL – Association d’avocats The European Court of Human Rights, in a judgment of 4 December 2025 (No. 9953/16 – Kosmatska v. Ukraine), found Ukraine responsible for ensuring the full restitution of the applicant’s property title over a...
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance (opens in a new tab)
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.