Europe – The European Court of Human Rights, in a judgment of 4 December 2025 (No. 9953/16 – Kosmatska v. Ukraine), found Ukraine responsible for ensuring the full restitution of the applicant’s property title over a plot of land, or providing her with financial compensation or equivalent property, when the land had been purchased in good faith from individuals who had acquired it fraudulently to the detriment of the Ukrainian State. The Court held that, although the public-interest objective invoked (restoration of land lawfulness) may be legitimate, the measure applied to the applicant was disproportionate due to her good faith and the State’s failure in maintaining land registers, as this dispossession imposed an excessive individual burden on the bona fide citizen

Europe – The European Court of Human Rights, in a judgment of 4 December 2025 (No. 9953/16 – Kosmatska v. Ukraine), found Ukraine responsible for ensuring the full restitution of the applicant’s property title over a plot of land, or providing her with financial compensation or equivalent property, when the land had been purchased in good faith from individuals who had acquired it fraudulently to the detriment of the Ukrainian State. The Court held that, although the public-interest objective invoked (restoration of land lawfulness) may be legitimate, the measure applied to the applicant was disproportionate due to her good faith and the State’s failure in maintaining land registers, as this dispossession imposed an excessive individual burden on the bona fide citizen

par | 4 décembre 2025 | *Europe

HAVET & VANHUFFEL – Association d’avocats Europe – The European Court of Human Rights, in a judgment of 4 December 2025 (No. 9953/16 – Kosmatska v. Ukraine), found Ukraine responsible for ensuring the full restitution of the applicant’s property title...
Europe – In a judgment dated November 18, 2025 (Application no. 53002/21), the European Court of Human Rights held that the demolition of a fence erected in 1964 by a company that had occupied the land prior to that date, and the eviction of the company without prior notice or access to procedural safeguards, constituted a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the European Convention on Human Rights (absolute nature of the right to property).

Europe – In a judgment dated November 18, 2025 (Application no. 53002/21), the European Court of Human Rights held that the demolition of a fence erected in 1964 by a company that had occupied the land prior to that date, and the eviction of the company without prior notice or access to procedural safeguards, constituted a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the European Convention on Human Rights (absolute nature of the right to property).

par | 24 novembre 2025 | *Europe

HAVET & VANHUFFEL – Association d’avocats In a judgment dated November 18, 2025 (Application no. 53002/21), the European Court of Human Rights held that the demolition of a fence erected in 1964 by a company that had occupied the land prior to that...
World – COP30 ends with a minimal agreement on 22 November 2025. While progress was made—such as the tripling of adaptation support for developing countries by 2035—no advancement or roadmap was agreed regarding the phase-out of fossil fuels

World – COP30 ends with a minimal agreement on 22 November 2025. While progress was made—such as the tripling of adaptation support for developing countries by 2035—no advancement or roadmap was agreed regarding the phase-out of fossil fuels

par | 23 novembre 2025 | *Europe

HAVET & VANHUFFEL – Association d’avocats COP30 ends with a minimal agreement on 22 November 2025. While progress was made—such as the tripling of adaptation support for developing countries by 2035—no advancement or roadmap was agreed regarding the...
Europe – By judgment of 20 November 2025 (C‑204/24), the Court of Justice of the European Union condemns Ireland for failing to correctly transpose numerous provisions of Directive 2000/60/EC, the “Water Framework Directive,” into Irish law

Europe – By judgment of 20 November 2025 (C‑204/24), the Court of Justice of the European Union condemns Ireland for failing to correctly transpose numerous provisions of Directive 2000/60/EC, the “Water Framework Directive,” into Irish law

par | 21 novembre 2025 | *Europe

HAVET & VANHUFFEL – Association d’avocats The Court of Justice of the European Union condemns Ireland for failing to correctly transpose numerous provisions of Directive 2000/60/EC, the “Water Framework Directive”, into Irish law. General context of...
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Résumé de la politique de confidentialité

Ce site utilise des cookies afin que nous puissions vous fournir la meilleure expérience utilisateur possible. Les informations sur les cookies sont stockées dans votre navigateur et remplissent des fonctions telles que vous reconnaître lorsque vous revenez sur notre site Web et aider notre équipe à comprendre les sections du site que vous trouvez les plus intéressantes et utiles.