Europe – Greece – By judgment of 5 June 2025 (Commission v. Greece –  C‑359/24), the Court of Justice of the European Union finds the Hellenic Republic in breach of obligations for not having updated the management plans for its river basin districts and its flood risk management plans within the time limits prescribed by Directives 2000/60/EC of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy and 2007/60/EC of 23 October 2007 on the assessment and management of flood risks

Europe – Greece – By judgment of 5 June 2025 (Commission v. Greece – C‑359/24), the Court of Justice of the European Union finds the Hellenic Republic in breach of obligations for not having updated the management plans for its river basin districts and its flood risk management plans within the time limits prescribed by Directives 2000/60/EC of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy and 2007/60/EC of 23 October 2007 on the assessment and management of flood risks

HAVET & VANHUFFEL – Association d’avocats This is an action for failure to fulfil obligations brought by the Commission against the Hellenic Republic. On 15 February 2023, the Commission sent the Hellenic Republic a letter of formal notice stating...
Europe – Norway – The Court of Justice of the European Free Trade Association considered in a judgment of 21 May 2025 (case E-18/24) that downstream gas emissions, namely gas emissions from petroleum products produced on the basis of a permit, must be taken into account in the environmental impact assessment of the project when applying for a permit. They constitute effects of this project within the meaning of Directive 2011/92/EU of 13 December 2011 on environmental

Europe – Norway – The Court of Justice of the European Free Trade Association considered in a judgment of 21 May 2025 (case E-18/24) that downstream gas emissions, namely gas emissions from petroleum products produced on the basis of a permit, must be taken into account in the environmental impact assessment of the project when applying for a permit. They constitute effects of this project within the meaning of Directive 2011/92/EU of 13 December 2011 on environmental

HAVET & VANHUFFEL – Association d’avocats The Court of Justice of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA Court) held in a judgment of 21 May 2025 (Case E-18/24) that greenhouse gas emissions emitted by the combustion of oil and natural gas extracted...
Europe – On a preliminary question referred by the Council of State of Belgium, the Court of Justice of the European Union, by judgment of 8 May 2025 (C/236-24), held that, Article 9a of Directive 2011/92/EU of 13 December 2011 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment, as amended by Directive 2014/52/EU of 16 April 2014, must be interpreted as meaning that where the authority competent to determine whether a project referred to in Article 4(2) of Directive 2011/92, as amended, must be subject to an environmental impact assessment, in accordance with Articles 5 to 10 of Directive 2011/92, as amended, is also the developer of the project concerned, an appropriate separation between the conflicting functions in the performance of that task must at least be applied

Europe – On a preliminary question referred by the Council of State of Belgium, the Court of Justice of the European Union, by judgment of 8 May 2025 (C/236-24), held that, Article 9a of Directive 2011/92/EU of 13 December 2011 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment, as amended by Directive 2014/52/EU of 16 April 2014, must be interpreted as meaning that where the authority competent to determine whether a project referred to in Article 4(2) of Directive 2011/92, as amended, must be subject to an environmental impact assessment, in accordance with Articles 5 to 10 of Directive 2011/92, as amended, is also the developer of the project concerned, an appropriate separation between the conflicting functions in the performance of that task must at least be applied

HAVET & VANHUFFEL – Association d’avocats On a preliminary question referred by the Council of State of Belgium, the Court of Justice of the European Union, by judgment of 8 May 2025 (C/236-24), held that, Article 9a of Directive 2011/92/EU of 13...
Europe – By judgment of 8 May 2025 (C-318/23), the Court of Justice of the European Union finds that the Republic of Slovenia has failed to take the necessary measures to manage waste on plot no. 115/1 in the municipality of Teharje (Bukovžlak) in compliance with its judgment of 16 July 2015 (Commission v Slovenia – C 140/14) and has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 260(1) TFEU. It orders the Republic of Slovenia to pay the European Commission a lump sum of EUR 1,200,000

Europe – By judgment of 8 May 2025 (C-318/23), the Court of Justice of the European Union finds that the Republic of Slovenia has failed to take the necessary measures to manage waste on plot no. 115/1 in the municipality of Teharje (Bukovžlak) in compliance with its judgment of 16 July 2015 (Commission v Slovenia – C 140/14) and has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 260(1) TFEU. It orders the Republic of Slovenia to pay the European Commission a lump sum of EUR 1,200,000

HAVET & VANHUFFEL – Association d’avocats By a judgment of 16 July 2017 (C-140/14 – Commission v Slovenia), the Court held that the Republic of Slovenia had breached its obligations by authorising the dumping of excavated material on plot No 115/1 in...
Résumé de la politique de confidentialité

Ce site utilise des cookies afin que nous puissions vous fournir la meilleure expérience utilisateur possible. Les informations sur les cookies sont stockées dans votre navigateur et remplissent des fonctions telles que vous reconnaître lorsque vous revenez sur notre site Web et aider notre équipe à comprendre les sections du site que vous trouvez les plus intéressantes et utiles.