Europe – Italy – In a ruling of 5 February 2026 (Cases C 364/24 and C 393/24 – Findenato v. Italy), the Court of Justice of the European Union held that restrictions or bans imposed by a state on the cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) do not violate the principles of free movement of goods or freedom of enterprise, nor do they infringe the principles of proportionality or equality

Europe – Italy – In a ruling of 5 February 2026 (Cases C 364/24 and C 393/24 – Findenato v. Italy), the Court of Justice of the European Union held that restrictions or bans imposed by a state on the cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) do not violate the principles of free movement of goods or freedom of enterprise, nor do they infringe the principles of proportionality or equality

HAVET & VANHUFFEL – Association d’avocats Europe – Italy – In a ruling of 5 February 2026 (Cases C‑364/24 and C‑393/24 – Findenato v. Italy), the Court of Justice of the European Union held that restrictions or bans imposed by a state on the...
Netherlands – On 28 January 2026, the District Court of The Hague, in Greenpeace v. State of the Netherlands (Case No. C/09/659832 / HA ZA 24-53), ordered the Dutch State to incorporate into its national legislation, within eighteen months from this judgment, at least absolute emission reduction targets for the entire economy, as provided for in Article 4(1) of the Paris Agreement

Netherlands – On 28 January 2026, the District Court of The Hague, in Greenpeace v. State of the Netherlands (Case No. C/09/659832 / HA ZA 24-53), ordered the Dutch State to incorporate into its national legislation, within eighteen months from this judgment, at least absolute emission reduction targets for the entire economy, as provided for in Article 4(1) of the Paris Agreement

HAVET & VANHUFFEL – Association d’avocats On 28 January 2026, the District Court of The Hague, in Greenpeace v. State of the Netherlands (Case No. C/09/659832 / HA ZA 24-53), ordered the Dutch State to incorporate into its national legislation, within...
Europe – Poland – Court of Justice of the European Union, 21 January 2026 (CaseT‑174/24), Chemicals Poland SA and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company v. European Commission : Dismissal of the action against Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/197 on the classification of DAPD (Category 1B, reproductive toxicant)

Europe – Poland – Court of Justice of the European Union, 21 January 2026 (CaseT‑174/24), Chemicals Poland SA and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company v. European Commission : Dismissal of the action against Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/197 on the classification of DAPD (Category 1B, reproductive toxicant)

HAVET & VANHUFFEL – Association d’avocats Court of Justice of the European Union, (Case T‑174/24), 21 January 2026, Djchem Chemicals Poland SA and The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company v. European Commission : Dismissal of the action against...
Europe – Bulgaria – In a judgment of 22 January 2026 (Case C‑206/23), the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) orders the Republic of Bulgaria to pay the European Commission a lump sum of €1,500,000 and a daily penalty of €9,000 for failing, within the time limit set for this purpose, namely 30 June 2021, and also at the date of the Court’s examination of the facts, to adopt the necessary measures to transpose into its national law the provisions of Directive 2018/2001 on renewable energy, and, accordingly, to communicate those measures to the European Commission, thereby persisting in its failure

Europe – Bulgaria – In a judgment of 22 January 2026 (Case C‑206/23), the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) orders the Republic of Bulgaria to pay the European Commission a lump sum of €1,500,000 and a daily penalty of €9,000 for failing, within the time limit set for this purpose, namely 30 June 2021, and also at the date of the Court’s examination of the facts, to adopt the necessary measures to transpose into its national law the provisions of Directive 2018/2001 on renewable energy, and, accordingly, to communicate those measures to the European Commission, thereby persisting in its failure

HAVET & VANHUFFEL – Association d’avocats In a judgment of 22 January 2026 (Case C‑206/23), the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) orders the Republic of Bulgaria to pay the European Commission a lump sum of €1,500,000 and a daily penalty of...
Europe – Ireland — In a judgment of 15 January 2025 (Case C-129/24), the Court of Justice of the European Union held that, although Article 2 of Directive 2003/4/EC on public access to environmental information does not require applicants for access to information to identify themselves, it nevertheless does not preclude national legislation from imposing such an obligation of identification, provided that the principles of equivalence and effectiveness are respected, that is, that the rules are not less favourable than those applicable under national law and do not render the exercise of the right of access impossible or excessively difficult

Europe – Ireland — In a judgment of 15 January 2025 (Case C-129/24), the Court of Justice of the European Union held that, although Article 2 of Directive 2003/4/EC on public access to environmental information does not require applicants for access to information to identify themselves, it nevertheless does not preclude national legislation from imposing such an obligation of identification, provided that the principles of equivalence and effectiveness are respected, that is, that the rules are not less favourable than those applicable under national law and do not render the exercise of the right of access impossible or excessively difficult

HAVET & VANHUFFEL – Association d’avocats In a judgment of 15 January 2025 (Case C-129/24), the Court of Justice of the European Union held that, although Article 2 of Directive 2003/4/EC on public access to environmental information does not require...
Europe – Italy – In a ruling of 5 February 2026 (Cases C 364/24 and C 393/24 – Findenato v. Italy), the Court of Justice of the European Union held that restrictions or bans imposed by a state on the cultivation of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) do not violate the principles of free movement of goods or freedom of enterprise, nor do they infringe the principles of proportionality or equality

Europe – In a judgment of 18 December 2025 (Case C-316/24 P), the Court of Justice of the European Union partially annulled the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 21 February 2024 (Case T-536/22) and the Commission decision rejecting the request for internal review of the renewal of the approval of cypermethrin, an insecticide used in the EU, on the grounds of several errors of law and insufficient reasoning. By its judgment of 18 December 2025 (Case C-316/24 P), the Court of Justice of the European Union partially annulled the judgment of the General Court of 21 February 2024 (T-536/22), which had dismissed the action brought by PAN Europe against the Commission decision of 23 June 2022 refusing the internal review of the regulation renewing the approval of cypermethrin, an ininsecticide used in the EU, on the grounds of several errors of law and insufficient reasoning

HAVET & VANHUFFEL – Association d’avocats In a judgment of 18 December 2025 (Case C-316/24 P), the Court of Justice of the European Union partially annulled the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 21 February 2024 (Case T-536/22) and...
Résumé de la politique de confidentialité

Ce site utilise des cookies afin que nous puissions vous fournir la meilleure expérience utilisateur possible. Les informations sur les cookies sont stockées dans votre navigateur et remplissent des fonctions telles que vous reconnaître lorsque vous revenez sur notre site Web et aider notre équipe à comprendre les sections du site que vous trouvez les plus intéressantes et utiles.