Europe – Romania – The Court of Justice of the European Union held in a judgment of 16 October 2025 (C-391/23) that Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 2021 establishing the framework for achieving climate neutrality and amending Regulations (EC) No 401/2009 and (EU) 2018/1999 (‘European Climate Law’) must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which subjects producers of electricity from renewable sources to a tax on income from the sale of their electricity above a certain price set by that regulation, but which exempts producers of electricity from fossil fuels from that tax when that regulation does not appear likely to have a decisive influence on the achievement of the objective of climate neutrality collectively, to the Union and the Member States for 2050 or to have the effect that the Member State which adopted it thereby fails to fulfil its obligation to take the measures necessary to enable the achievement of this common objective

Europe – Romania – The Court of Justice of the European Union held in a judgment of 16 October 2025 (C-391/23) that Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 2021 establishing the framework for achieving climate neutrality and amending Regulations (EC) No 401/2009 and (EU) 2018/1999 (‘European Climate Law’) must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which subjects producers of electricity from renewable sources to a tax on income from the sale of their electricity above a certain price set by that regulation, but which exempts producers of electricity from fossil fuels from that tax when that regulation does not appear likely to have a decisive influence on the achievement of the objective of climate neutrality collectively, to the Union and the Member States for 2050 or to have the effect that the Member State which adopted it thereby fails to fulfil its obligation to take the measures necessary to enable the achievement of this common objective

par | 18 octobre 2025 | *Europe

HAVET & VANHUFFEL – Association d’avocats La Cour de justice de l’Union européenne répondait à une question préjudicielle qui lui était posée par décision de la Cour d’appel de Bucarest (Roumanie)du 7 février 2023. Cette question est posée dans...
Europe – Italy – In a judgment delivered on 9 October 2025 (cases nos. 1986/09 and 67556/13), the European Court of Human Rights condemned Italy to the restitution of property that had been confiscated as an accessory penalty following a conviction for unlawful land development (“lottizzazione abusiva”), finding a violation of Article 7 (principle of legality of penalties) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the European Convention on Human Rights (protection of property)

Europe – Italy – In a judgment delivered on 9 October 2025 (cases nos. 1986/09 and 67556/13), the European Court of Human Rights condemned Italy to the restitution of property that had been confiscated as an accessory penalty following a conviction for unlawful land development (“lottizzazione abusiva”), finding a violation of Article 7 (principle of legality of penalties) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the European Convention on Human Rights (protection of property)

par | 12 octobre 2025 | *Europe

HAVET &  VANHUFFEL – Association d’avocats Two groups of applicants had brought their cases before the Court. The first group consists of the perpetrators of the offense sentenced by the Italian courts to confiscation. The second group consists of a...
Europe – Greece – By judgment of 9 October 2025 (C-368/24), the Court of Justice of the European Union ordered Greece to pay the Commission a penalty payment of EUR 12,500 per day from the date of delivery of the judgment and to pay it the sum of EUR 5,500,000 for maintaining on the island of Zakynthos, at Gryparaiika, a landfill site which is malfunctioning, saturated and does not comply with the conditions and requirements of EU environmental regulations, in contradiction with its judgment of 17 July 2014, Commission / Greece (C-600/12)

Europe – Greece – By judgment of 9 October 2025 (C-368/24), the Court of Justice of the European Union ordered Greece to pay the Commission a penalty payment of EUR 12,500 per day from the date of delivery of the judgment and to pay it the sum of EUR 5,500,000 for maintaining on the island of Zakynthos, at Gryparaiika, a landfill site which is malfunctioning, saturated and does not comply with the conditions and requirements of EU environmental regulations, in contradiction with its judgment of 17 July 2014, Commission / Greece (C-600/12)

par | 10 octobre 2025 | *Europe

HAVET & VANHUFFEL – Association d’avocats Greece was condemned by a judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 17 July 2014, Commission v Greece (C-600/12 – https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/FR/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62012CJ0600) for...
Belgique – Région de Bruxelles-Capitale : La Cour constitutionnelle belge suspend, par arrêt du 11 septembre 2025 (n°115/2025), l’ordonnance du Parlement de la Région de Bruxelles-Capitale du 21 mars 2025 qui reporte du 1er janvier 2025 au 1er janvier 2027 l’interdiction de circulation dans la zone à faible émissions (ZFE) pour certains véhicules en ce compris pour les véhicules diésel Euro 5 et essence Euro 2

Belgique – Région de Bruxelles-Capitale : La Cour constitutionnelle belge suspend, par arrêt du 11 septembre 2025 (n°115/2025), l’ordonnance du Parlement de la Région de Bruxelles-Capitale du 21 mars 2025 qui reporte du 1er janvier 2025 au 1er janvier 2027 l’interdiction de circulation dans la zone à faible émissions (ZFE) pour certains véhicules en ce compris pour les véhicules diésel Euro 5 et essence Euro 2

par | 12 septembre 2025 | *Europe

HAVET & VANHUFFEL – Association d’avocats Par arrêt du 11 septembre 2025 (n°115/2025), la Cour constitutionnelle suspend l’ordonnance du Parlement de la Région de Bruxelles-Capitale du 21 mars 2025 « modifiant l’ordonnance du 2 mai 2013 portant le Code...
Europe – France – Répondant à une question préjudicielle posée par le Conseil d’Etat français, la Cour de Justice de l’union Européenne a considéré dans un arrêt du 1er août 2025 (C-772/24) que les étiquettes apposées directement sur les fruits et légumes ne constituent pas toujours des emballages au sens de la directive 94/62

Europe – France – Répondant à une question préjudicielle posée par le Conseil d’Etat français, la Cour de Justice de l’union Européenne a considéré dans un arrêt du 1er août 2025 (C-772/24) que les étiquettes apposées directement sur les fruits et légumes ne constituent pas toujours des emballages au sens de la directive 94/62

par | 27 août 2025 | *Europe

HAVET & VANHUFFEL – Association d’avocats Répondant à une question préjudicielle posée par le Conseil d’Etat français, la Cour de Justice de l’union Européenne a considéré dans un arrêt du 1er août 2025 (C-772/24) que les étiquettes apposées...
Europe – Romania – The Court of Justice of the European Union held in a judgment of 16 October 2025 (C-391/23) that Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 June 2021 establishing the framework for achieving climate neutrality and amending Regulations (EC) No 401/2009 and (EU) 2018/1999 (‘European Climate Law’) must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which subjects producers of electricity from renewable sources to a tax on income from the sale of their electricity above a certain price set by that regulation, but which exempts producers of electricity from fossil fuels from that tax when that regulation does not appear likely to have a decisive influence on the achievement of the objective of climate neutrality collectively, to the Union and the Member States for 2050 or to have the effect that the Member State which adopted it thereby fails to fulfil its obligation to take the measures necessary to enable the achievement of this common objective

Europe – By judgment of 1 August 2025 (C 461/24), the Court of Justice of the European Union held that Directive 2011/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on environmental impact assessment does not preclude legislation of a Member State which, in the context of a procedure for assessing the environmental impact of a project, provides for authorities to be consulted at the same time as the public concerned, from not authorising the said public to communicate its observations on the opinions given by those authorities

par | 25 août 2025 | *Europe

HAVET & VANHUFFEL – Association d’avocats By judgment of 1 August 2025 (C 461/24), the Court of Justice of the European Union held that Directive 2011/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on environmental impact...
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Résumé de la politique de confidentialité

Ce site utilise des cookies afin que nous puissions vous fournir la meilleure expérience utilisateur possible. Les informations sur les cookies sont stockées dans votre navigateur et remplissent des fonctions telles que vous reconnaître lorsque vous revenez sur notre site Web et aider notre équipe à comprendre les sections du site que vous trouvez les plus intéressantes et utiles.